Изучение иностранных языков по скайп
Работаем по всему миру

GMAT Scoring: AWA

AWA Score (half-integers from 0 to 6)

Score 6 — Outstanding

A 6 paper presents a cogent, well‐articulated critique of the argument and demonstrates mastery of the
elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category exhibits the following characteristics:
• clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
• develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions
• eff ectively supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor flaws

Score 5 — Strong

A 5 paper presents a well‐developed critique of the argument and demonstrates good control of the
elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category exhibits the following characteristics:
• clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them in a generally thoughtful
way
• develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically, and connects them with appropriate transitions
• sensibly supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have occasional
flaws

Score 4 — Adequate

A 4 paper presents a competent critique of the argument and demonstrates adequate control of the
elements of writing.
A typical paper in this category exhibits the following characteristics:
• identifies and analyzes important features of the argument
• develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily but may not connect them with transitions
• supports the main points of the critique
• demonstrates sufficient control of language to convey ideas with reasonable clarity
• generally follows the conventions of standard written English but may have some flaws

Score 3 — Limited

A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in analytical writing skills and in its control of the elements
of writing but is plainly flawed.
A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more of the following characteristics:
• does not identify or analyze most of the important features of the argument, although some analysis of the argument is present
• mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly
• is limited in the logical development and organization of ideas
• offers support of little relevance and value for points of the critique
• does not convey meaning clearly
• contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics

Score 2 — Seriously Flawed

A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing skills.
A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more of the following characteristics:
• does not present a critique based on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer’s own
views on the subject
• does not develop ideas, or is disorganized and illogical
• provides little, if any, relevant or reasonable support
• has serious and frequent problems in the use of language and in sentence structure
• contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics that interfere with meaning

Score 1 — Fundamentally Deficient

A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing skills.
A typical paper in this category exhibits more than one of the following characteristics:
• provides little evidence of the ability to understand and analyze the argument
• provides little evidence of the ability to develop an organized response
• has severe and persistent errors in language and sentence structure
• contains a pervasive pattern of errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics that results in incoherence

Score 0 No Score

A paper in this category is off topic, not written in English, is merely attempting to copy the topic, or
consists only of keystroke characters.


Sharing is caring

Оставить комментарий


Рубрики

Преподаватели

teacher-Yana
Яна
Ведущий преподаватель
Опыт: 10 лет --------------------------- Язык: английский Преподает: Общий курс языка Курс грамматики Интенсивный курс Курс для детей и школьников Курс…
teacher-anna
Анна
Ведущий преподаватель
Меня зовут Анна, я «живу английским» и не могу себе представить свою жизнь без него.